← All cases

Engajamundo · 2018

Climate narratives as evidence for historic litigation in the Supreme Federal Court.

Take the climate crisis out of scientific abstraction and turn it into material evidence for advocacy, strategic litigation and public mobilization in Brazil.

ConservationCampaignStrategy
01Challenge

To move the climate crisis from scientific abstraction and technical reports to connect it with the daily reality of Brazilians. The challenge was to build a unified narrative among seven civil society organizations — with distinct actions and audiences — to prove that climate change already affects the economy, health, and territory in Brazil, taking advantage of the COP24 window to drive public debate and support political advocacy actions.

02Solution

Structuring a multiplatform web documentary operating as an advocacy and mobilization tool. The strategy connected real stories of six Brazilians impacted by extreme climate events with unprecedented scientific data, translating the urgency of the issue into an accessible and human language. Communication coordination aligned the efforts of seven organizations (Engajamundo, Greenpeace, ISA, Instituto Alana, Conectas, Article 19, and APIB), ensuring scale at launch during the UN Climate Conference and transforming audiovisual content into material evidence for strategic litigation.

  1. Fase 01

    Coalition — seven organizations, one narrative

    Coordination between Engajamundo, Greenpeace, ISA, Instituto Alana, Conectas, Artigo 19 and APIB to align message, calendar and launch scale.

  2. Fase 02

    Web documentary — people and data

    Six real stories of Brazilians affected by extreme climate events were connected to unprecedented scientific data, translating technical urgency into accessible language.

  3. Fase 03

    Advocacy — from screen to Supreme Court

    The audiovisual content became a political advocacy piece: attached as amicus curiae in ADPF 708, the case in which the Supreme Court banned the contingency of the Climate Fund.

Narrative became evidence. And evidence became a historic judicial decision.

03Results
7 NGOs
unprecedented coalition between socio-environmental and human rights organizations
ADPF 708
documentary used as evidence in the amicus curiae at the Supreme Court
1st place
36th OAB-RS Human Rights Journalism Award
COP24
coordinated global launch in Katowice, Poland
04Materials

Have a similar challenge?

Talk to PontoCo